Home  >  Finance

Magellan consumer sold to MiTAC

MiTac to pay up to $96 million



Magellan consumer sold to MiTAC
Magellan Navigation, Inc. today announced it has entered into a definitive agreement to sell the Magellan consumer products division to MiTAC International Corp. Closing of the transaction is anticipated in January of 2009. Magellan consumer products include RoadMate and Maestro series portable car navigation systems, and the Magellan Triton outdoor handheld GPS devices.

Financial terms have not been disclosed; however, we can be sure that it is far lower than the staggering $170 million paid by Shah Capital for the full entity in 2006. Indeed, Magellan was known for having financial difficulties since it fired a large part of its personnel as well as its CEO in the recent months (read our previous article here). Almost two years after buying Navman consumer business for $16 million, MiTAC is taking over Magellan.

Despite its difficulties, Magellan is still having a large retail presence in the United States making it the third brand for Personal Navigation Devices. This acquisition is likely to mean the end of Mio (another brand from MiTAC) as a brand in the United States where the company has been struggling to establish a strong presence, lacking the product differentiation and the marketing dollars of the leaders.

A challenge for MiTAC
However, this acquisition will be an important challenge for MiTAC. First, its past acquisition of Navman did not prove to be a real success, especially on markets where both Mio and Navman were present. Eighteen months after this acquisition the market share of Mio was far to amount to the addition of the two brands’ market shares at the time of the merger. Therefore MiTAC’s management will have to better handle the transition than what it did in the past.

Second, despite its maintained shelves space in the United States, Magellan brand has been strongly hurt due to a lack of customer support and the little innovation offered by the company in the PND space.

Will MiTAC do better than Shah Capital to straighten up Magellan? The future will tell…

Monday December 15, 2008
Ludovic Privat




1.Posted by insider on 2008-12-15 18:00
that's incredible news. but mitac is more a hw company...so the cultures of a technology company such as magellan could become quite a challenge.

mitac is more a TA company, so this could mean a new customer for TA....


2.Posted by joe on 2008-12-15 18:30
96 million purchase.. not 16

3.Posted by Ludovic Privat on 2008-12-15 19:25
I confirm Navman consumer was sold for $16 million
http://www.gpsbusinessnews.com

4.Posted by Not surprised on 2008-12-15 23:08
Having worked with Magellan product and senior management over the last two years, I can't believe it took them this long to give up. They lacked any sense of innovation and failed to think beyond very basic and ineffective minor feature enhancements.

This should be a lesson to all the PND guys - innovate in a meaningful way. Or die.

5.Posted by shedo on 2008-12-16 11:17
What about Magellan Professional department ?
Are they part of the deal ? Do they remain a separate entity, with the risk to change their name again ?

6.Posted by Ludovic Privat on 2008-12-16 11:19
the B2B division is not part of the deal, they seem to remain a separate entity; but one might argue it could be sold any time soon if Shah Capital wants to get out of the GPS business entirely.
http://www.gpsbusinessnews.com

7.Posted by Eddy on 2008-12-16 17:11
MiTAC was Magellan's ODM having produced Magellan PND's for many years since Magellan stopped producing and supporting their own devices many years ago. Info from insiders is that Shah Capital agreed to surrender Magellan consumer in exchange to retire the $70M debt that it owed MiTAC. Prior to Shah's acquisition in 2006, Thales had wrung every cent out of Magellan, made no investment in new product, technology, or people, and stepped away from product support. Shah paid $170M for a shell of a company and millions of dollars of obsolete and unsaleable merchandise they needed to scrap or write down. Despite it all, Magellan has more brand equity than MiTAC's Mio, so at the end of the day, MiTAC retired Shah's debt, and acquired a name brand and the reminants of a company that long since ceased being a viable business entity. A sad story.

8.Posted by Seen the inside on 2008-12-16 19:24
No one should be surprised by this. Long term employees jumping ship months ago, lack of advertising, and in recent months people in control that really didn't know how to move the company foward. So sad...the company had such great potential, lack of senior management all but buried the company

9.Posted by insider on 2008-12-17 15:46
i didn't know that mitac produced for Magellan! so ...there are no real winners here...mitac didn't really want magellan from a strategic point of view.....it's just a way of rerieving the 70mln that were lost...

10.Posted by Jack on 2008-12-21 01:51
MiTAC were one of the many manufacturers for Magellan. Buying Magellan means they'll get 100% of the production.

With the current slump in the economy, MiTAC's factories must be running much below their capacity, so this will help keep their factories busy.

11.Posted by Eddy on 2008-12-23 21:18
Magellan owned the firmware and routing algorithms, (patched and repatched many times over the years to add features) that ran on Mitac produced WIN CE based hardware. Magellan had responsibility for the industrial design of the products that Mitac produced for them, but the electrical design of the Magellan hardware was owned by Mitac. Magellan provides Mitac with a brand that still retains strong consumer recognition and brand equity. It's a much better acquisition than the Navman blunder that offered no market synergies. If Mitac can fix Magellan's product support, they could be left with a strong contender. That is if Mitac is also game to invest the marketing resources to reestablish Magellan's voice in a glutted, commodity-based PND market. Mitac didn't pay any 'blue-sky' for a previously blue-chip name, so they should be in a position to make that marketing investment.

12.Posted by Freddy on 2009-08-12 23:03
Be interesting to see what Mitac does with this old hot potato. It's too bad. There was nothing wrong with Magellan product, but customer support didn't answer calls. It's difficult to recommend the line on account of it. The retailers get customer blow back.
http://www.gpscentral.ca

New comment:

Car navigation | Sport and Outdoor | Location Based Services | Innovation | Market Data | Finance | People and Jobs | Voices of the industry